Group vs Individual Web Accessibility Evaluations: Effects with Novice Evaluators
نویسندگان
چکیده
s on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 662–663. ACM, ACM Press, 2002. G.W. Hill. Group versus individual performance: Are N+1 heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91(3):517–
منابع مشابه
A Web Accessibility Auditing Instrument to Assist Novice Evaluators
The ubiquitous nature of the internet and the diversity of user groups means that established techniques for accessibility evaluation may need to evolve in order to be effective. This paper describes the development of a web accessibility auditing instrument, known as the Accessibility Evaluation Assistant (AEA) designed to assist novice auditors in the process of an accessibility evaluation fo...
متن کاملA Web-Based Evaluation Framework for Supporting Novice and Expert Evaluators of Adaptive E- Learning Systems
Based upon the analysed results of an evidence based study conducted over a period of four years, it is clear that it is difficult to identify, for a given evaluation objective, the range of appropriate evaluation techniques (methods, metrics, criteria and approaches to be used). This paper presents a Web-based evaluation framework which is freely available online, designed to support both novi...
متن کاملOn the performance of novice evaluators in usability evaluations
The paper investigates the performance of novice evaluators in usability evaluations by presenting the results of a comparative usability evaluation that was conducted by nine novice evaluator teams. The evaluation teams performed considerably well in terms of the validity of their results, which counts for their participation in usability evaluation projects. The thoroughness of the results ob...
متن کاملTowards a sustainable web accessibility
Cases like Target.com show that there is still uncertainty about the precise meaning of “web accessibility”, about how to identify accessibility problems, and about when to claim that a web site is accessible. In this paper I suggest that the only way to change this is by focussing on sustainable accessibility, i.e. by shaping and establishing effective accessibility processes that can be susta...
متن کاملCollaborative Aggregation of Individual Rating for Group Evaluation
The aggregation of individual evaluations into a group evaluation is a key issue in decision theory. Inspired by the collaboration idea on Web2.0, two group evaluation methods of collaborative weighting evaluators where evaluators rate the objects evaluated are presented to form group decision. Among the most commonly applied methods for group evaluation are to average the scores obtained by ea...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Interacting with Computers
دوره 28 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016